Speculative versus Fact-Based Opinion In Toxic Tort Litigation

by Dr. Ronald E. Gots 20 February 09
ICTM has found that many attorneys and judges experience difficulty distinguishing expert opinions which are speculative from those which are solidly-founded in scientific fact. Often times, conjecture is accepted as readily as fact-based opinion because it came from an "expert." [More]

Relevance or Fit: The Meaning and Use of This Important Element Of Daubert

by Dr. Ronald E. Gots 20 January 09
How experts misuse scientific literature A critical element of Daubert, specifically stated, is that scientific literature used by experts to support their opinions must be relevant (or, fit) the situation extant in the case. Frequently, experts provide such “support” with long biblio... [More]